I chose to do my visual analysis on the 84 black and white images put together by Santiago Sierra, called 89 Huicholes. The work features 84 pictures of people from the Huichol tribe in Mexico, where the pictures were taken. The limited visibility aspect of this piece is that the people are photographed from behind and we can't see their faces, only their back, neck, and back of the their head.
| Santiago Sierra. 89 Huicholes. 2006. Mexico |
| sketch |
The pictures are of people from the Huichol Tribe who live in the rugged terrain of Mexico in 2006. They are said to be one of the few remaining tribes that still have Pre-Colombian Traditions. The rugged terrain and 5 day journey to their village has kept the modern way of life out of their society. They live a simple life and survive of the land. Huichol means the life of Shamans, they are healing people and are very connected spiritually with the Earth. They do have some modern ways of life such as a dentist that travels to them every so often to provide dental care. The Huichol Foundation is working to help them preserve their culture and traditions by providing them with the things they need to do so. The Huichol Tribe is open to people coming to their village to learn about their ways of life. (http://www.huicholfoundation.org)
With that being said they are indigenous people who struggle to like Native Americans in America did/do for land and other rights. In the pictures they have their backs to the camera which creates the meaning of the work. All Sierra gives the viewers is the title which explicitly gives the viewers exactly what they are looking at, however he doesn't go further than that leaving the viewers to interpret his art to find the meaning. I think the meaning created by not showing their faces is that they don't have a voice or are not "worthy" of having their faces shown. The position of facing away from someone also suggests guilt, or punishment. This work makes me think about how the people of the Huichol Tribe are different than modern society and might be viewed like they aren't as good as modern people. This work particularly caught my eye at CAM because of the interactive role the viewer has with the art to give the people meaning and faces. Looking at someones back who is holding a small child, and both are wearing traditional clothes made me think about the differences in the life I live and the life they live. If I had seen their faces I wouldn't have connected myself to them because I'd be able to read their faces to know how they feel about their lifestyle.
This is what Santiago Sierra had to say about it, "The interesting thing is also that when you have somebody… when you don’t see the face of somebody, their position becomes more active, you know, you have to think why does she not show me the face, you know. And in a world full of images, this image, which is an anti image in a way, becomes full of meaning, because the person has to create what the person doesn’t see." (http://www.magasin3.com/en/exhibition/santiago-sierra-2/)
This is not the only work by Sierra that captures the backs of people, leaving their faces unknown. In 184 Peruvian workers he does the same thing capturing the backs of 184 workers. He also gave homeless women one night in a hotel room for standing facing a wall in a mall. Following the Iraq Afghanistan war he had veterans stand facing a corner for an exhibit. All of his work is very evocative and has deeper meanings. They all have meaning surrounding social conditions, violence, religion, or societies in general. (magasin3)
I think this piece was chosen by the Curators to be apart of the Limited Visibility exhibit because it represents limited visibility in every way. It provokes viewers to think about the people photographed and find the meaning behind the work. This was easily my favorite work at CAM because of the level of thought I had to put into determining the purpose behind it.
Great post- I appreciate that you looked to other sources to supplement your analysis.
ReplyDelete